Question # 1
| As part of a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) deployment, a customer is planning to
implement the vSphere IaaS control plane. What component could be installed and
enabled to implement the solution? | | A. Storage DRS
| | B. Aria Automation
| | C. Aria Operations | | D. NSX Edge networking |
B. Aria Automation
Explanation: In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, the vSphere IaaS (Infrastructure as
a Service) control plane extends vSphere to provide cloud-like provisioning and
automation, typically through integration with higher-level tools. The question asks which
component enables this capability. Let’s evaluate:
Option A: Storage DRS-
Storage DRS (Distributed Resource Scheduler) automates storage management (e.g., load
balancing) within vSphere. It’s a vSAN/vSphere feature, not an IaaS control plane, as it
lacks broad provisioning or orchestration capabilities. This is incorrect.
Option B: Aria Automation-
This is correct. VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) integrates with
VCF via SDDC Manager to provide an IaaS control plane on vSphere. It enables selfservice
provisioning of VMs, applications, and infrastructure (e.g., via blueprints), extending
vSphere into a cloud model. In VCF 5.2, Aria Automation’s vSphere IaaS control plane
feature (introduced in vSphere 7.0+) allows direct management of vSphere resources as
an IaaS platform, making it the key component for this solution.
Option C: Aria Operations-
Aria Operations (formerly vRealize Operations) provides monitoring and analytics for VCF.
It tracks performance and health, not provisioning or IaaS control. While valuable, it doesn’t
implement an IaaS control plane, so this is incorrect.
Option D: NSX Edge networking-
NSX Edge provides advanced networking (e.g., load balancing, gateways) in VCF. It
supports IaaS by enabling network services but isn’t the control plane itself—control planes
orchestrate resources, not just network them. This is incorrect.
Conclusion: The component to install and enable for the vSphere IaaS control plane is
Aria Automation (B). It transforms vSphere into an IaaS platform within VCF 5.2, meeting
the customer’s deployment goal.
Question # 2
| During the requirements capture workshop, the customer expressed a plan to use Aria
Operations Continuous Availability to satisfy the availability requirements for a monitoring
solution. They will validate the feature by deploying a Proof of Concept (POC) into an
existing low-capacity lab environment. What is the minimum Aria Operations analytics node
size the architect can propose for the POC design? | | A. Small
| | B. Medium
| | C. Extra Small
| | D. Large |
A. Small
Explanation: The customer plans to use Aria Operations Continuous Availability (CA), a
feature in VMware Aria Operations (formerly vRealize Operations) introduced in version 8.x
and supported in VCF 5.2, to ensure monitoring solution availability. Continuous Availability
separates analytics nodes into fault domains (e.g., primary and secondary sites) for high
availability, validated here via a POC in a low-capacity lab. The architect must propose the
minimum node size that supports CA in this context. Let’s analyze:
Aria Operations Node Sizes: Per the VMware Aria Operations Sizing Guidelines, analytics
nodes come in four sizes: -
Extra Small: 2 vCPUs, 8 GB RAM (limited to lightweight deployments, no CA support).
-
Small: 4 vCPUs, 16 GB RAM (entry-level production size).
-
Medium: 8 vCPUs, 32 GB RAM.
-
Large: 16 vCPUs, 64 GB RAM.
Continuous Availability Requirements: CA requires at least two analytics nodes (one per
fault domain) configured in a split-site topology, with a witness node for quorum. The
VMware Aria Operations Administration Guide specifies that CA is supported starting with
the Small node size due to resource demands for data replication and failover (e.g., memory
for metrics, CPU for processing). Extra Small nodes are restricted to basic standalone or
lightweight deployments and lack the capacity for CA’s HA features.
POC in Low-Capacity Lab: A low-capacity lab implies limited resources, but the POC must
still validate CA functionality. The VCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that Small nodes are
the minimum for production-like features like CA, balancing resource use with capability.
For a POC, two Small nodes (plus a witness) fit a low-capacity environment while meeting
CA requirements, unlike Extra Small, which isn’t supported. -
Option A: Small nodes (4 vCPUs, 16 GB RAM) are the minimum size for CA,
supporting the POC’s goal of validating availability in a lab. This aligns with VMware’s
sizing recommendations.
-
Option B: Medium nodes (8 vCPUs, 32 GB RAM) exceed the minimum, suitable
for larger deployments but unnecessary for a low-capacity POC.
-
Option C: Extra Small nodes (2 vCPUs, 8 GB RAM) don’t support CA, as
confirmed by the Aria Operations Sizing Guidelines, due to insufficient resources for
replication and failover, making them invalid here.
-
Option D: Large nodes (16 vCPUs, 64 GB RAM) are overkill for a low-capacity POC,
designed for high-scale environments.
Conclusion: The minimum Aria Operations analytics node size for the POC is Small (A),
enabling Continuous Availability in a low-capacity lab while meeting the customer’s validation goal.
Question # 3
| A customer has a requirement to use isolated domains in VMware Cloud Foundation but is
constrained to a single NSX management pane. What should the architect recommend
satisfying this requirement? | | A. An NSX VPC
| | B. A Shared NSX Instance
| | C. NSX Federation
| | D. A 1:1 NSX Instance |
A. An NSX VPC
Question # 4
The following requirements were identified in an architecture workshop for a VMware Cloud
Foundation (VCF) design project utilizing vSAN for its primary storage solution:
REQ001: Application must maintain a minimum of 1,000 transactions per second (TPS)
during business hours excluding disaster recovery (DR) scenarios.
REQ002: Automatic DRS and HA must be utilized.
REQ003: Planned maintenance must be executed outside of business hours.
Which of the following test scenarios should be added and performed to validate these
requirements? | | A. Trigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operation. | | B. Trigger a vCenter Server update. | | C. Trigger a vSAN disk group evacuation | | D. Trigger a failure of an ESXi host. |
D. Trigger a failure of an ESXi host.
Explanation: To validate the stated requirements, the test scenario must address all three:
application performance (1,000 TPS), automatic DRS and HA functionality, and
maintenance timing (implying minimal disruption during business hours). In a VCF
environment with vSAN, test scenarios should simulate real-world conditions that challenge
these requirements. Let’s evaluate each option:
Option A: Trigger a Virtual Machine vMotion operationvMotion tests DRS’s ability to
migrate VMs for load balancing, which aligns with REQ002’s “automatic DRS” mandate. It
can be scheduled outside business hours (REQ003) to minimize impact. However, it
doesn’t fully test HA (automatic failover) or ensure 1,000 TPS (REQ001) under failure
conditions, as vMotion is a planned operation, not a failure scenario. This is a partial match
but not comprehensive.
Option B: Trigger a vCenter Server updateUpdating vCenter tests management plane
resilience but doesn’t directly validate application performance (REQ001), DRS/HA
automation (REQ002), or vSAN-specific behavior. While it could relate to maintenance
(REQ003), it’s unrelated to workload or storage functionality in the VCF design, making it
irrelevant here.
Option C: Trigger a vSAN disk group evacuationEvacuating a vSAN disk group
simulates maintenance (REQ003) by moving data to other nodes, testing vSAN’s
resilience. It may involve DRS for VM migration (REQ002), but it doesn’t trigger HA
failover. While it could indirectly affect TPS (REQ001), the requirement excludes DR
scenarios, and this test doesn’t guarantee performance validation during business hours
under normal operations or host failure.
Option D: Trigger a failure of an ESXi hostSimulating an ESXi host failure directly tests
REQ002: HA automatically restarts VMs on other hosts, and DRS balances the load postfailure.
In a vSAN environment, it also validates data availability (vSAN rebuilds objects),
ensuring 1,000 TPS (REQ001) is maintained during business hours under failure
conditions (excluding DR, as this is a single-host failure within a site). While not a
maintenance task (REQ003), it implicitly ensures maintenance-like disruptions (e.g., host
failure) don’t violate performance, aligning with VCF’s HA/DRS automation goals. TheVCF
5.2 Administration Guiderecommends host failure testing to validate HA and vSAN
resilience.
Conclusion: Option D comprehensively validates REQ001 (TPS under failure), REQ002
(automatic DRS and HA), and indirectly supports REQ003 by ensuring business-hour
performance during unplanned events, making it the best test scenario
Question # 5
| An administrator is designing a new VMware Cloud Foundation instance that has to
support management, VDI, DB, and general workloads. The DB workloads will stay the
same in terms of resources over time. However, the general workloads and VDI
environments are expected to grow over the next 3 years. What should the architect
include in the documentation? | | A. An assumption that the DB workload resource requirements will remain static.
| | B. A constraint of including the management, DB, and VDI environments.
| | C. A requirement consisting of the growth of the general workloads and VDI environment.
| | D. A risk that the VCF instance may not have enough capacity for growth. |
A. An assumption that the DB workload resource requirements will remain static.
Explanation: In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design documentation includes
assumptions, constraints, requirements, and risks to define the solution’s scope and
address potential challenges. The scenario provides specific information about workload
types and their behavior over time, which the architect must categorize appropriately. Let’s
evaluate each option:
Option A: An assumption that the DB workload resource requirements will remain
static
This is the correct answer. An assumption is a statement taken as true without proof,
often based on customer-provided information, to guide design planning. The customer
explicitly states that “the DBwork loads will stay the same in terms of resources over time.”
Documenting this as an assumption reflects this fact and allows the architect to size the
VCF instance with a fixed resource allocation for DB workloads, while planning scalability
for other workloads. This aligns with VMware’s design methodology for capturing stable
baseline conditions.
Option B: A constraint of including the management, DB, and VDI environments
This
is incorrect. A constraint is a limitation or restriction imposed on the design, such as existing
hardware or policies. The need to support management, VDI, DB, and general workloads is
a requirement (what the solution must do), not a limitation. Labeling it a constraint
misrepresents its role—it’s a design goal, not a restrictive factor. Constraints might include
budget or rack space, but this scenario doesn’t indicate such limits.
Option C: A requirement consisting of the growth of the general workloads and VDI
environment
This is a strong contender but incorrect in this context. A requirement defines
what the solution must achieve, and the customer’s statement that “general workloads and
VDI environments are expected to grow over the next 3 years” could be a requirement
(e.g., “The solution must support growth…”). However, the question asks for a single item,
and Option A better captures a foundational planning element (static DB workloads) that
directly informs sizing. Growth could be a requirement, but it’s less immediate than the
assumption about DB stability for initial design documentation.
Option D: A risk that the VCF instance may not have enough capacity for growth
This is incorrect as the primary answer. A risk identifies potential issues that could impact
success, such as insufficient capacity for growing workloads. While this is a valid concern
given VDI and general workload growth, the scenario doesn’t provide evidence of
immediate capacity limitations—only an expectation of growth. Risks are typically
documented after sizing, not as the sole initial inclusion. The assumption about DB
workloads is more fundamental to start the design process.
Conclusion: The architect should include an assumption that the DB workload resource
requirements will remain static(Option A). This reflects the customer’s explicit statement,
establishes a baseline for sizing the Management Domain and Workload Domains, and
allows planning for growth elsewhere. While growth (C) and risk (D) are relevant, the
assumption is the most immediate and appropriate single item for initial documentation in
VCF 5.2.
Question # 6
| A customer has a requirement to improve bandwidth and reliability for traffic that is routed
through the NSX Edges in VMware Cloud Foundation. What should the architect
recommend satisfying this requirement? | | A. Configure a Load balanced Group for NSX Edges
| | B. Configure a TEP Group for NSX Edges
| | C. Configure a TEP Independent Group for NSX Edges
| | D. Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges |
D. Configure a LAG Group for NSX Edges
Question # 7
| An architect decided to deploy an NSX Edge cluster using SDDC Manager. These Edges
will be used by a Tier-0 Gateway configured with BGP to provide North-South connectivity
in the Management Domain. Which statement justifies this design decision? | | A. NSX Edges deployed via SDDC Manager can be updated separately in the future.
| | B. VPN service in NSX will be available and configurable via SDDC Manager with NSX
Edges deployed using this method.
| | C. Extra Large form factor is available only when edges are deployed using SDDC
Manager.
| | D. This deployment method will automatically configure dynamic routing. |
B. VPN service in NSX will be available and configurable via SDDC Manager with NSX
Edges deployed using this method.
Explanation: In VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2, NSX Edge clusters provide critical
networking services, such as North-South connectivity via Tier-0 Gateways, often using
BGP for dynamic routing. Deploying NSX Edges via SDDC Manager integrates them into
the VCF lifecycle management framework, which impacts their configuration and
operational capabilities. Let’s analyze each option: -
Option A: NSX Edges deployed via SDDC Manager can be updated separately in the
futureIn VCF, SDDC Manager manages the lifecycle (deployment, upgrades, etc.) of NSX
components, including Edge nodes. However, updates are not performed “separately” from
the VCF stack; they are part of a coordinated upgrade process across the management
domain. TheVCF 5.2 Administration Guidenotes that Edge updates are tied to NSX
Manager and SDDC Manager workflows, contradicting the idea of independent updates.
This doesn’t justify the design decision.
-
Option B: VPN service in NSX will be available and configurable via SDDC Manager
with NSX Edges deployed using this methodWhen NSX Edges are deployed via SDDC
Manager in the Management Domain, they are fully integrated into the VCF architecture.
This enables advanced NSX features, such as VPN services (L2VPN, IPsec VPN), to be
configured and managed through SDDC Manager or NSX Manager UIs. TheVMware Cloud
Foundation 5.2 Networking Guideconfirms that deploying Edges via SDDC Manager
supports North-South connectivity (e.g., via Tier-0 with BGP) and additional services like
VPN, providing operational flexibility. This justifies the decision by aligning with VCF’s
integrated management capabilities.
-
Option C: Extra Large form factor is available only when edges are deployed using
SDDC ManagerNSX Edge form factors (Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large) are
determined by resource requirements and deployment method, but the Extra Large form
factor is available whether Edges are deployed manually via NSX Manager or through
SDDC Manager in VCF. TheNSX-T Data Center Installation Guide(part of VMware docs)
clarifies that form factor selection is independent of the deployment tool, making this
statement inaccurate and not a justification.
-
Option D: This deployment method will automatically configure dynamic routing
Deploying Edges via SDDC Manager automates some aspects of setup (e.g., cluster
creation, basicnetworking), but dynamic routing (e.g., BGP) requires manual configuration
of peers, ASNs, and route maps via NSX Manager. TheVCF 5.2 Networking Guidestates
that while SDDC Manager streamlines deployment, BGP configuration remains a postdeployment
task, disproving “automatic” configuration as a justification.
Conclusion: Option B is the correct justification because deploying NSX Edges via SDDC
Manager ensures integration with VCF’s management plane, enabling features like VPN
services alongside BGP-based North-South connectivity in the Management Domain. This
aligns with the architect’s goal of leveraging VCF’s centralized management strengths.
VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Dumps
5 out of 5
Pass Your VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam Exam in First Attempt With 2V0-13.24 Exam Dumps. Real VCP-VCF Architect Exam Questions As in Actual Exam!
— 90 Questions With Valid Answers
— Updation Date : 15-Apr-2025
— Free 2V0-13.24 Updates for 90 Days
— 98% VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam Exam Passing Rate
PDF Only Price 49.99$
19.99$
Buy PDF
Speciality
Additional Information
Testimonials
Related Exams
- Number 1 VMware VCP-VCF Architect study material online
- Regular 2V0-13.24 dumps updates for free.
- VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam Practice exam questions with their answers and explaination.
- Our commitment to your success continues through your exam with 24/7 support.
- Free 2V0-13.24 exam dumps updates for 90 days
- 97% more cost effective than traditional training
- VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam Practice test to boost your knowledge
- 100% correct VCP-VCF Architect questions answers compiled by senior IT professionals
VMware 2V0-13.24 Braindumps
Realbraindumps.com is providing VCP-VCF Architect 2V0-13.24 braindumps which are accurate and of high-quality verified by the team of experts. The VMware 2V0-13.24 dumps are comprised of VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam questions answers available in printable PDF files and online practice test formats. Our best recommended and an economical package is VCP-VCF Architect PDF file + test engine discount package along with 3 months free updates of 2V0-13.24 exam questions. We have compiled VCP-VCF Architect exam dumps question answers pdf file for you so that you can easily prepare for your exam. Our VMware braindumps will help you in exam. Obtaining valuable professional VMware VCP-VCF Architect certifications with 2V0-13.24 exam questions answers will always be beneficial to IT professionals by enhancing their knowledge and boosting their career.
Yes, really its not as tougher as before. Websites like Realbraindumps.com are playing a significant role to make this possible in this competitive world to pass exams with help of VCP-VCF Architect 2V0-13.24 dumps questions. We are here to encourage your ambition and helping you in all possible ways. Our excellent and incomparable VMware VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam exam questions answers study material will help you to get through your certification 2V0-13.24 exam braindumps in the first attempt.
Pass Exam With VMware VCP-VCF Architect Dumps. We at Realbraindumps are committed to provide you VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam braindumps questions answers online. We recommend you to prepare from our study material and boost your knowledge. You can also get discount on our VMware 2V0-13.24 dumps. Just talk with our support representatives and ask for special discount on VCP-VCF Architect exam braindumps. We have latest 2V0-13.24 exam dumps having all VMware VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam dumps questions written to the highest standards of technical accuracy and can be instantly downloaded and accessed by the candidates when once purchased. Practicing Online VCP-VCF Architect 2V0-13.24 braindumps will help you to get wholly prepared and familiar with the real exam condition. Free VCP-VCF Architect exam braindumps demos are available for your satisfaction before purchase order.
Send us mail if you want to check VMware 2V0-13.24 VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam DEMO before your purchase and our support team will send you in email.
If you don't find your dumps here then you can request what you need and we shall provide it to you.
Bulk Packages
$50
- Get 3 Exams PDF
- Get $33 Discount
- Mention Exam Codes in Payment Description.
Buy 3 Exams PDF
$70
- Get 5 Exams PDF
- Get $65 Discount
- Mention Exam Codes in Payment Description.
Buy 5 Exams PDF
$100
- Get 5 Exams PDF + Test Engine
- Get $105 Discount
- Mention Exam Codes in Payment Description.
Buy 5 Exams PDF + Engine
 Jessica Doe
VCP-VCF Architect
We are providing VMware 2V0-13.24 Braindumps with practice exam question answers. These will help you to prepare your VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Exam exam. Buy VCP-VCF Architect 2V0-13.24 dumps and boost your knowledge.
|
